Ever open your monthly cable bill and want to cry? And wonder why in hell are you spending over a hundred dollars a month to watch television?
Some people
are making demands to get a law passed where you only pay for the channels you
watch, and I think that’s a wonderful idea. Of course the cable companies don’t
want that but it will eventually happen; why should I pay for the Hungarian Polka channel when I just
care about Bravo TV?
Cable companies spill their champagne and say they can’t afford to do pay-for-channels because the TV networks charge too much; I say the TV companies will get less Grinch-like when they lose business 100%. TV channels make so much off advertising; they can afford to charge the cable companies less; why should the public be getting screwed in every direction without even a dinner first?
Last year in
Canada the government said that the country was going to begin requiring
cable providers to unbundle the television service they offer, allowing
customers to pick and choose which stations they’re willing to pay to watch. Hell
to the yeah—where do I sign up?Cable companies spill their champagne and say they can’t afford to do pay-for-channels because the TV networks charge too much; I say the TV companies will get less Grinch-like when they lose business 100%. TV channels make so much off advertising; they can afford to charge the cable companies less; why should the public be getting screwed in every direction without even a dinner first?
Would you keep ABC to watch shows like Revenge? |
Of course the television industry is likely to fight such
legislation because they make way-too much money. If the law did go into effect
many predict that only 20 stations would survive the fallout and I say GOOD! Do
we really need so many channels and so many TV shows? I don’t think so. Also
with Netflix and other online sources, many have already decided to kiss their
regular cable goodbye.
No comments:
Post a Comment